Spread the love
Professor Michael Levitt FRS is a globally renowned biophysicist and chemist. He received the 2013 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. His long record of distinguished …
source
Daily Global New Media
Professor Michael Levitt FRS is a globally renowned biophysicist and chemist. He received the 2013 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. His long record of distinguished …
source
12 TIMES MICHAEL – CONGRATS (again) …… shame about the to post from right wing media https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWwn6f-WLTI&ab_channel=Politico
Covid is over https://youtu.be/whXXJgJQhgU
It’s all Political!
9:07 and there you have it folks, PROFIT they were paid in $hekle$
I’m have been in the mortuary business for forty years. About twenty years ago in Orange County California there was spell during the winter in which every mortuary, crematory, coroner’s office and storage facility was over capacity. Refrigerator trucks were rented and fold out tables placed everywhere with two bodies on them…there was never a peep about it in the media! This year there has been no overflow of cases and absolutely no rise in deaths. Covid has been put on death certificates for suicide drug overdoses, motorcycle accidents and heart attacks! The number of elderly who die every year from pneumonia type conditions has been replaced with Covid. I honestly think that covid is less deadly than unchecked acne. It is unequivocally a hoax and a crime against humanity.
Everyone needs to share this video along
This is it!!! This is the Evil plan!!!
Operation Lockstep:- From the Rockefeller playbook -1st Phase: Create and release a super contagious but low-mortality rate virus. Have the media cause mass hysteria about it by blowing death counts out of proportion by falsifying death certificates, by using pre-contaminated test-kits, double-counting/testing, and classifying most nonrelated deaths as COVID-19. A lockdown (total of about 3 months slowly extended over time in multiple intervals) will condition the population to live under draconian measures/restrictions and repeatedly echo that a vaccine is needed. Actively suppress protests and isolate instigators with severe financial/judicial penalties.
Keep up the quarantine as long as possible to destroy the region's economy, break down the supply chain to cause food shortages, civil unrest, and more protests. Eventually, end Phase 1 lockdown when public push-back is increasing. Clearly state on MSM that ending this lockdown might be too early but allow it anyways.2nd Phase: The lockdown, fear, and social distancing will steadily compromise the population's immune system, amplified by wearing masks, longer wifi/5G exposure indoors, by diminished exposure to sunlight, fresh air, healthy bacteria, and the absence of intimacy and healthy food supplies. When people re-emerge into society more people will fall ill, which will be blamed on COVID-19 and again be emphasized by MSM. Bring up the potential need for a second lockdown, backed-up by overhyped numbers of infection towards august 2020.
This will all occur before the vaccination is ready, to justify it. Around October-November a longer (6+ months) and more potent lockdown will follow until everyone takes the vaccine. This time penalties for civil disobedience are increased and fines are replaced with jail-time. Blame the protesters for the second wave. Set up more check-points with military assistance, introduce mandatory Track&Trace apps, and take control over food-/gas supplies and services to which civilians now need permission to access. Keep extending the lockdown, degrading the supply chain, and amplify food shortages. Quell any public outrage using extreme action and force and single out opposition leaders as public enemy number one.
Roll out large scale vaccination programs and make health certification mandatory and a prerequisite for entering the new normal.
The minority that defies the agenda will be denied access to work or supplies and not be allowed to travel.3rd Phase: In case the majority of people resist the vaccine, a weaponized SARS/HIV/MERS virus will be released with a 30%+ higher mortality rate than COVID-19 and again be blamed on protesters. This will be the ultimate push for everyone to accept the vaccination and the rules within the new system. A cryptocurrency system (International Patent: wo/2020/060606) will be implemented in combination with digital ID2020 monitoring body activity, human behavior, and willingness to submit using food/shelter/water as a weapon of enforcement in the new economic system. Basically: do what we want and get rewarded with credits and obtain privileges or go against the system and get penalized and lose access to necessary means to survive.
Our time is nearly up unless we take the control back from these MONSTERS
Source ROCKEFELLER – OPERATION LOCKSTEP https://www.bitchute.com/video/lc1io3yVqHvD.
"We the people" must be aware of what is now going on here? We have now with us in every country in the World "The Unholy Trinity" Government, Media, and Medical Terrorism of the People, all working hand in hand. Now just think about this for a moment? If that's not a conspiracy well Are you getting the message ? Its time to listen to the real doctors not the SPIN Doctors!!!
No mandatory vaccine are you listening to politicians on all sides? YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!!!
Israel 30 deaths… this video didnt age very well
Masks -> Vaccine -> microchip -> 5G -> transhumanism: https://youtu.be/ywuCRVJVDqs
Please share widely.
It's all very well but when are these clever-trevors going to begin instigating law-suits with such irrefutable evidence? Once a few aspects of the lock-down have been sued, the rest will flee in panic.
Wow that was my first John Anderson somenothing sandwich, usually I enjoy your program so very much.
The good old enigmatic they….
The Lexicon of Enslavement.
I would write the book, but who would publish it? How do you measure demoralization? That's the big question.
.05 % Death rate in the U.S.A.
The word pandemic was chosen because it is so poorly defined.
Whoever is behind this is mad genius. So far they are nameless and faceless. Clearly we need to give a death percentage in the definition of pandemic. The same is true with the word epidemic. This is a lot similar to what Jordan Peterson was talking about when he talked about the creation of the term hate crime.
Weird how there's no recent info from professor Michael Levitt. I suspect he's been shadow banned for stating the obvious
"500 deaths per million population doing nothing", says the Noble laureate. The US is now up to nearly that number of deaths, after about 4 months of mixed intensity lock downs. Israel has now had 20X the number of deaths Levitt predicted a couple months previous to this. Levitt has been so embarrassingly wrong he really should stick to things he knows about, rather than tainting his legacy and aligning himself with science-denying creeps, and creating fodder for those creeps who say we can't believe the experts.
So with the massive increase in cases recently in Victoria, in Australia…..what should be done?….some of these so-called academics have no idea of the real world…but, it's mainly about solutions….I wish these guys would give come up with some.
Interesting how Europe has been hit hardest when the virus is said to have originated in Asia…
E X A C T
A lot of issues, no facts nevertheless.
Doctors are the Key https://youtu.be/txWGAkZtpx4
His numbers are easily proven wrong. He clearly is slanted- He is a co Nobel laureate- in chemistry not epidemiology.
who is paying hospitals for covid deaths and using ventilators ????
Goblins seem to say the same thing..all in unison, singing, almost celebrating this
Dr Andrew Kaufman, David Icke, The Dollar Vigilante, a host of others all know whats really going on
They've NEVER proven or isolated an actual virus and work on germ theory vs terrain theory on how a virus supposedly spreads. No proper debate has been allowed in mainstream which all follow the BILL GATES NARRATIVE, an unqualified unelected billionaire trying to control the world and force vaccines upon us with the threat of not being able to live properly in society unless we get one. Quarrantine for the healthy is a crime and so is restriction of travel and now the right to breathe air freely. No studies were ever shown to us about the effects of this TORTURE (just look at Amnesty International's own definition of torture, Amazing Polly has done a great breakdown of it) even thou they claim to be doing it for our safety like all tyrants do, under threat of violence/punishment of we don't voluntarily comply. And now all accountability has been thrown out the window after they were forced to say they lied to us about mask use for our own good when we caught them out on doing a 180. The tests are flawed even if u believe a virus actually exists, the inventor of the PCR test even says it himself. We now have Karens policing the neighborhood and social media for the psychopaths in power, very dark days.
Despite having COVID myself (probably gone by now, waiting for a test to be done) I must admit I am still unable to get a clear understanding of the situation (locally, and certainly not globally). Here in Israel the gov. took harsh measures very early , for a densely populated country that is, probably based on the Italian situation that was developing and very transparent. As almost all COVID cases came through certain countries in Europe it was fairly easy to monitor the situation at the first stages PLUS, and it's a big thing, Israelis are generally more used to a 'mood' of sudden drastic change (to the bad) of their daily reality of life, so for a FEW weeks would usually follow and obey of authorities instructions. In 2006 and 2014 we had whole summer seasons of living under crisis (rockets in both cases), with nights sleep often disturbed, no leisure or travelling, etc, as routine.
So the combination of all of this (and a good public free health system) helped reaching 'good stats'.
Now there is a big 'but' here. The first wave of the pandemic have hit the more urban and disciplined portions of the society and was absent from peripheral, rural or semi nomadic groups. When (by May) most restrictions were lifted the pandemic immidiatly had outbursts among non urban populations, illigal migrant quarters and soon after: schools.
Seems that masks didn't do much help, or at least were only postponing the escalation by a week. Taking the aspect of 'hardware' of human behaviour as a parameter in the equation (Brits cant become Kiwies in their daily routine, Israelis cant become Japanese, etc etc) I am slowly coming to the conclusion that if we assume that COVID is not stricly 'seasonal': its outbursts can't be avoided and a '2nd wave' will always come. Its like a tropical storm and we need to improve our ways of handling it.
Stats in Israel were quite easily to check all the way as its a small country with an easy to run public system (not federal, only 15 or so hospitals around the country having COVID units, army managing the system of 'COVID hotels'.)
It seems that mortality rate is lower than suspected as long as you prevent the pandemic from harvesting in care homes and have a good and accessible health system. Just my thoughts.
9 of 9 Dr. John Campell talks about the Swedish measures bordering on Eugenics in his video Sweden The Jury Returns https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4SQ-NOV-iU (that was in June). He has also prescribed these palliative cocktails in certain cases throughout his medical career, so they do have their place in medicine, he is not on principle against them.
But he has plausible suspicions (backed up by data) that the Swedes have now practices for elderly people in care homes that border on eugenics. I suspect that family cannot visit or not much (to not get the infection into the homes even more), so if an old person happens to get worse and die fast – and was not in a good shape to begin with – there are no upset relatives to deal with.
At least the relatives cannot prove the neglect. And because of the use of the "end of life cocktails" (morphine etc. in in the mix) staff is spared to watch the struggle of the elderly that are denied the chance to get into a hospital (or even simple measures like oxygen).
The palliative cocktails smoothe over the suffocation in the end (and shorten that phase – those cocktails are known to somewhat interfere with breathing – which is a tradeoff that is accepted for their normal use, to make it easier for people who are sure to die).
8 of 9 Now for the "Eugenics" part of the Swedish model: They keep the infected / sick old in the care homes, and do not send them to hospitals. Prescriptions of palliative cocktails for patients in care homes haven gone up. The numbers of OLD people in the ICU have gone DOWN compared with 2019.
In other words, they let them die, give them an end of life cocktail that makes it less obvious – and also more bearable for STAFF.
Those cocktails have a negative effect on breathing. Doctors accept that as trade off – in cases where a person is going to die anyway.
Dr. Campell says they do not even give oxygen (in some cases he heard of, it is not clear if that was incompetence of a few homes or systematic). That is a low key intervention: they should be able to do that, even in a care home. And that would change outcomes for some.
He also would not deploy all measures to save a frail 80 year old – not like he would do for a younger person who could have potentially many more good years – but oxygen would always be on "the menu".
Another idiocy when Sweden started with their different approach: they did not have enough protectice equipment in the beginning. The claim then was: the younger Swedes would go about their normal life, few mandates and restrictions – and the elderly and the higher risk people would be isolated and protected.
Nope: staff brings the infection into the homes, relatives also infect at-risk-persons that do not live in a home but among the regular population. Think a kid or young adult with diabetes 1, or the 40 year old that battles cancer.
And since there were hardly any restrictions the normal population spread it more. Children / teenagers up to 16 years still meet in school (I think for some time they had only half the time, likely so they could have more space for half the class).
Children and teenagers are very good spreaders (many asymptomatic cases), children are less aware and consistent with hygiene, ….
They have staff that switches between care homes.
And to make things worse: in the beginning they did not have the protective gear for staff working in care homes. The staff had contact with the normal population so they had higher risks to get infected, and spread it more (and to spread it even better, working for more than one care home)
– the Swedish "lockdown" was almost non-existent (no mass events and home schooling / working from home for those who could), so more chances for normal citizens to become spreaders.
The over 16 year olds stayed home, they likely had online learning. Most women hold a job, so if the smaller children would not have gone to school, they would have needed to find solutions to supervise kids till age 16 – like in Germany and Austria.
In Austria no real life school for all over 14 – they can stay home alone. Now, they have summer holidy till beginning of September. Real school was voluntary for under 14 – so families who could keep the kids at home, did so. Those who had to work and had no family, got help and services to still watch over the children (also regarding childcare).
Germany and Austria had it easier to handle that, because the traditional family model is more common (stay at home parent or mum works part time). But France also has a comparable high rate of women in the workforce than Sweden, so they had to find a solution for children that cannot stay home alone during their lockdown.
France did a strict lockdown, they had a lot of cases and deaths – btw Sweden has now surpassed them considerably regarding the deaths per million residents. France had a bad situation in March / April, but now they have a grip on it. Like Italy or Spain, ….
7 of 9 Sweden has bad results (deaths in care homes, among the elderly), but their hospitals do better than those in the U.K. and the U.S. Several reasons (and some quite sinister – see next comment):
Their healthcare system is much better funded that that of the U.K. Or in the U.S. for low income people.
They have paid sick leave.
Single payer so medical care free at the point of service. Sweden allegedly does not test much …..
Employees in Europe with a "cold" do not have to gamble, they get their test free, the result fast, if it is corona (or something else that they recover from at home) they continue to have full income (and usually it is hard to fire them during the time of sick leave, and what is the point of firing them after they have recovered and return to work).
In the U.S.: Many cannot missout on the wage for a few days. Plus they would get fired. Or they cannot afford the doctor / hospital visit (if it turns out is is not corona the usual bad conditions apply).
A younger worker with no preexisting condtions that needs the income, has no sick leave, and is under insured, may be tempted to "wing it" and hope for the best, while they continue to go to work (after taking anti-fever medication). Chances are THEY are not going to die. If they end up in the hospital – they would have landed there anyway.
With that gamble (that is forced on them) they endanger of course others who are older, overweight, have high risk relatives at home and bring the virus into their families – from work.
Potential spreaders (especially if low-income) mainly think of themselves: they often lived from pay cheque to pay cheque in the "good" economy (2015 – 2019) – Society also does not care about them either. Or they would have paid sick leave and single payer already.
Sweden has also the advantage of having more hospital beds than the U.S. per 1000 residents (that U.S. number is no hard to beat, even Italy does better and they have been applying austerity on their healthcare system before the corona virus crisis).
6 of 9 Now, I expect the high official U.S.death numbers still be too low (people dying alone at home or in underfunded care homes). If you now – in July 2020 got a test (contact with a confirmed case) you currently have to wait 7 – 10 days for your test result in Florida (wealthy people).
People self-quarantine just in case.
That means when a person dies FAST and at home, no one is going to test them and to add them correctly to the death toll.
Case numbers of nations are not comparable.
A lot of testing is good policy and helps to MANAGE the pandemic and spread – but it makes the case numbers look higher, they FIND more.
Comparing the death numbers is the best (if still imperfect) parameter we have so far (I think most wealthy nations except for the U.S. have realistic numbers). At the end of the year we can count "excessive deaths".
5 of 9 We also had the 2009 FLU PANDEMIC. Estimates: 700 million to 1,4 billion got infected. But it was not as deadly, did not cause nearly as many hospital stays. AND IF people died of it, they mostly died within a short time. There were not nearly as many hospital stays or ICU beds necessary.
Either people were getting better after 7 – 10 days. Or the died. Or had died already. Most lived and revovered at home, Those who died, did so fast.
The hospitals were full then, too, but nothing like now in the areas where there is a surge of corona virus. It was not even discussed to restrict airtraffic for a few weeks, or wearing masks in 2009 (measures that are not too costly for the economy) .
As government / epidemiologist you would rather NOT have a contagious infection with a lot of light and undetected cases (when these cases still can spread the infection). You would rather deal with a terrible disease with a higher death rate (for the fewr or traceable infected) that is easier to contain.
4 of 9 It is a numbers game. Have huge numbers of infected people with not too bad outcomes in most cases – the hospital, ICU cases and deaths will be a byproduct of the LARGE NUMBERS.
"Spreads like a wildfire" easily undoes "death rate is lower than we thought, because there are so many untedetced cases".
Yes, and the many undetected cases means it is more contagious, the damn thing does spread like a wildfire. See Florida, Texas, Italy, and China in Wuhan until the Chinese could be bothered to get their head out of the sand.
We do not have so harmless outcomes in almost all cases, that we could let it spread and get herd immunity with little sacrifices (death toll). We are caught in the unhappy middle.
Herd immunity starts with 50 % of the population have at least some immunity. The more contagious a disease is, the higher the immunity must be – for CoVid-19 it would have to be in the 70 – 80 % range.
As individual you would rather have CoVid-19 than Ebola (the 2013 strain) or get MERS (which is a quite deadly but not very contagious version of corona virus).
The Ebola virus is likely as contagious as Sars-CoV-2 (at least somewhat in the same league). But there are no "light" or asymptomatic cases, so the health professionals and epidemiologists always know WHERE the infection cases are IF you have the resources of modern medicine and a modern administration.
That means Ebola is still easier to contain, even though it is fairly contagious and a terrible disease.
MERS has a 30 % death rate (the death rate may be even higher for Ebola) – but it is not vey contagious. A modern medical SYSTEM can contain these terrible infections – as bad as it is for the unfortunate individuals that contract it.
The WHO had warned months before that the African nations did not have the medical systems, the doctors the money and resources to deal with Ebola on their own. Only when it became a likely scenario that Ebola would spill over to the wealthy nations (2013) they jumped into action, funded the counter measures.
Ebola was contained fast after that – once it was handled with modern medicine. it did not even cost that much to help out the poor African nations, and there was no lockdown discussed.
(I do not even remember if there were mild and selective restrictions on airtraffic – which proves my point, it was a tempest in the teacup for the rich nations).
3 of 9 The only chance to contain the virus , is to have low case numbers to begin with and then to nip any flare-up in the bud. Almost all other countries needed a lockdown to return to the stage they had in February, when they would have had a chance to contain it – but only with testing and PPE ready to go and decisive action (see Taiwan, South Korea, … also Iceland).
Most nations were not prepared (exception Taiwan, South Korea, …) so they had to pay the price – and they learned from it. It cost them the lockdown to return to a stage where it is manageable.
The deaths in Florida (or Arizona, Texas, …) will manifest in 3 – 5 weeks, there is a lag. I wonder if it is Sweden or the U.S. who will take the lead – deaths per million people in the country.
Even if most cases are harmless or the patients are only very uncomfortable for 1 – 2 weeks but do not need the hospital – there will be a fallout in form of overwhelmed hospitals and preventable deaths.
Doctors also notice scaring of lung tissue even in seemingly less severe cases (recovered at home). THAT can lead to complications and earlier deaths. If a person has another health crisis and their lungs are the weakest part of the system, because of the CoVid-19 infection.
2 of 9 In Florida aprox 19 % of those that are tested, test positve (around July 10, 2020). That is a STATE AVERAGE (it was over 30 % in one county). The 19 % number (in that range, could be 18 or 20 %) is extremely high.
Of course they are behind with testing, it takes 7 – 10 days for affluent people ! (aquaintances of Ana Navarro who lives in FL) to get a test result.
The labs are overwhelmed, and of course the admin did not push to establish capacities for fast testing when there was time.
All other wealthy nations did use the time of lockdown in March and April to prepare. Almost all nations initially dragged their feet, but then they – finally ! – jumped into action, all hands on deck, and they learned the lesson from unfortunate Italy who was the first to be hit badly outside of China.
Italy paid dearly for the hard won insights – lockdwon too late and half hearted in the beginning (and nations that were lucky that they were NOT the first ones learned from their warning example. With an denial stage in February, but then they got very active ).
Italy NOW also has a grip on the case numbers. Currently Europeans are allowed to travel between those countries. they try to find a balance between summer tourism and being cautious.
They have contact tracing resp. testing people around confirmed infections – other countries watch like hawks every – potential – cluster, and not even with "cluster relatated testing" they find 19 % that test positive for SARS-CoV-2
The damn virus is so _contagious and "sneaky" in the way it spreads:
_ Asymptomatic spreaders. Medical staff that wears protective gear gets it anyway. Children are likely good spreaders because they have more often no or light symptoms only. Likely there is some spread via A/C ventilation systems.
1 of 9 July 14 2020: That did not age well (as was to be expected). – MOST wealthy nations have a grip on the pandemic, but not the U.S., U.K. and Sweden. Their death number curve has STILL not flattened, the numbers of deaths are STILL RISING in Sweden, U.S. U.K. – it has gotten much ! worse in the U.S. in the last days.
Some unbelievably inaccurate information here. From a scientist most irresponsible. Countries that took very early measures, lockdown one of them, are getting back on their feet economically. The same can be said of the 1918 pandemic. The US and Brazil aren't looking too flash, either. Many younger people dying or badly affected now. Also, Israel and South Africa having spikes. You are playing around with numbers and obfuscating. Very shoddy science.
Prof Levitt's source of data https://www.euromomo.eu/
Feel sorry for Ferguson? The guy is a fraud. His models are less reliable than going out on the street and asking the opinion of a random person. He has a track record in producing such dangerously wrong models. If George Box was still around, he'd probably modify his statement to "all models are wrong, some are useful and yet others are spectacularly wrong".