March 8, 2021

GIL

Daily Global New Media

NAOMI SEIBT – Message to the Media – HOW DARE YOU (German with English Subtitles)

1 min read

32 thoughts on “NAOMI SEIBT – Message to the Media – HOW DARE YOU (German with English Subtitles)

  1. If I had met you before you went public I would have warned you. It’s a brave thing to do. You are fighting religious people. Facts don’t mean anything to them. They are driven by feelings and you are challenging their believe system. Stay strong and thanks for enlightening the world.

  2. Liebe Naomi, danke für deine Videos! Vor allem für die Doku über das C-Virus. bzw. diesen PCR-Test! Danke und alles Gute für dich, ich warte auf deine nächsten Videos!

  3. When Donald Trump talks about media and FAKE NEWS, he is 100% right. Media have an agenda with left-extreme journalists. I watch TV from different countries (16 years German TV) and they are getting worse. Is it because the can’t see any global warming? I use thermometers and I find that it’s getting COLDER. We will fight them, our enemies.

  4. Thanks Naomi.
    Everybody: I tried to find a scientific paper backing Greta's 200 species per day thing. Earliest mention was 1995 by Adam Rogers of U.N. but no reference. Before that, 1889 by WV Reid saying '50 to 150 species per day'. Computer models. In reality, it is 1.7 species per year known extinct (by the authority, IUCN, 869 extinct since 1500).
    So Greta, why not switch the message over to the actual real living creatures threatened with extinction? 32,441 of them. Then maybe they will have a better future, and you will too, people won't mock you so much.

  5. In the 1990s, the Heartland Institute worked with the tobacco company Philip Morris to attempt to discredit the health risks of secondhand smoke and to lobby against smoking bans.[3][4]:233–34[5]

    Since the 2000s, the Heartland Institute has been a leading promoter of climate change denial.[6][7] It rejects the scientific consensus on climate change,[8] and says that policies to fight it would be damaging to the economy.[9]

  6. But the Heartland Institute did play down the risk of smoking for some tobacco giants. Didn't it? This kind of "scientific prostitution" looks really bad. So it is difficult to believe thier climate downplaying now. Don't you think?

  7. Of course it would seem suspicious, as she already stated – we´re talking about an American Corporation.

    Why are kids been used for this, when it should be scientists presenting their topics – both sides

    Get lost with semi-articulated kids that are used for medial influencing

  8. Excellently stated. Free speech, open discourse, open mindedness, objectivity when examining the facts… We all need to hold these values dear, and they aren't being respected by your critics.

  9. There's a paradigm shift in climate science which is about to take the world into a new phase of understanding:

    I propose that Andrea Ghez will soon prove that Einstein's theory of gravity is wrong: https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/1043472/einstein-theory-gravity-wrong-black-hole-experiment-andrea-ghez

    There is an alternative imagery based on the idea of dark/different matter existing at the centre of the Moon which pulls on the Earth's core to create the ocean tides. The pull would be especially strong when on the same plane as the Earth to create the Spring Tides.

    Evidence for a stronger gravitational pull on the orbital plane due to dark/different matter in planetary cores comes from this scientific paper: https://www.pnas.org/content/94/16/8329. It appears more technical than it needs to be. They are saying that the change in distant from the Sun (eccentricity) is only between 1% and 5% and so is way too small to generate the glaciers of ice ages. The orbit of the Earth also goes up and down in a more direct 100,000-year cycle (inclination) and so is a better fit to the data. They lack a credible mechanism but didn't think of an increase in tidal gravity as Earth's orbit traverses the orbital plane of Jupiter. This increase in tidal strength would bring extra precipitation to the polar regions. The increase in snowfall accumulates at a greater rate than summer melting, leading to glacial buildup and advance. The ice ages have little to do with the Sun, much more with the failed star Jupiter.

    Further evidence comes from the 405,000-year climate cycle which is attributed to Jupiter and Venus: https://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2018/05/07/milankovitch-cycles-deep-time/.

    Note that the official explanation is that they "perturb the Earth's orbit" to create the largest glacial cycle of them all. https://www.universetoday.com/139198/jupiter-and-venus-change-earths-orbit-every-405000-years/.

    But this still only makes the Earth at most 5% further away from the Sun. The dark/different matter theory is a better fit to the data. Jupiter causes extra tidal strength on the 100,000-year cycle and Venus brings even more every 4th cycle.

    It will be confusing to start with but is understandable to a layperson given enough thought.

  10. Den Menschen Angst zu machen, das genau ist das gern von der Politik und den Sponsoren der Politiker benutzte Mittel, wobei die Medien gerne mitspielen, wie auch die Internet-Medien von Seiten Google, Youtube, Facebook mittlerweile sich von dem Mafia-Komplex mitreißen lassen, weil es ihnen Nutzen bringt. Sauerei von Google auf deine Beträge auch noch Werbung für den Klimaquatsch einzustellen.
    Halte durch und gute Gesundheit.

  11. NAOMI du bist ein ehrliches,tapferes dirndl,lass die arschloecher Dich nicht runterkriegen.remember the truth will always survive GRETA ist nicht gesund und wird von kinderschaendern ausgenuzt

  12. Das Du für das Heartland arbeitest spricht Bände,das die mit EIKE zusammenarbeiten setzt dem noch die Krone auf.Aber das Du Dich für rechte Propaganda benutzen lässt zeigt das Du halt doch noch ein kleines einfach zu lenkendes Mädchen bist.

  13. The real truth is both sides of the aisle are full of crap. I have heard so much from the left that has been debunked, just as I have heard so much from the right that has been debunked. They both claim to use science, and that is true, but they use it selectively and both distort the data to prove their side. The right likes to say that humans are too weak to hurt the earth, yet we have poisoned thousands of miles of river water in the United States. We have created a three million square mile dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico. We have put so much pollution into the air that it turns the rain acidic enough to slowly dissolve lime stones. We have eaten a hole in our ozone layer, and we have made many species go extinct. So to say we have no measurable effect is just a lie. Wake up people, you are being lied to by both sides. Read the scientist documents themselves if you want the real truth.

  14. I refuse to sling mud at your objectors but I will say you are a brave young lady, keep up your work.
    Do not let people with opposing agendas get you down. If you do your homework your voice will always have meaning.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

5 × three =