March 4, 2021


Daily Global New Media

Naomi Seibt – the ANTI-GRETA?

1 min read

40 thoughts on “Naomi Seibt – the ANTI-GRETA?

  1. Greta was puppet a tool used by extreme climate terrorists. Naomi is a intelegent young lady who speeks with facts not blown up lies. FYI those scientists who looked at our contribution of CO2S looked at no other posabilities. They were payed 2 billion a year to come up with an answer that pleased UN and world governments. A blind person can see through the deceipt.

  2. Your suggestion that Naomi merely parrots the arguments of the Heartland Institute does her an injustice (and is grossly unfair). Unlike Greta, who doesn't even bother to pretend to know what she's talking about, Naomi is well-informed and more than able to argue her position with facts and figures. The difference between these two young women (there is only two years between them) and their approach to this subject couldn't be more stark: Greta is an intellectually challenged climate activist whose arguments are based entirely on the claims and computer models of a discredited pseudo-science, while Naomi's arguments are based on observations and measurements made in the real world.
    You are probably correct in saying that Naomi will never be as popular, or attract as much media attention, as Greta, but that in itself is almost proof of the validity of her arguments, since most people are stupid and more inclined to accept arguments that have emotional appeal than they are to consider arguments which actually require them to engage their brain and think for themselves.

  3. "Copy cat".. er no, Naomi is standing up with the facts (from science) to show what that the MSM is pumping out is not correct and if it was true that 97% of ALL scientists thought we cause global cooling.. er..warming…er climate change was real don't you think that every Gov' would be in panic mode? Only 64 papers out of 11,964 scientific papers say that climate change is directly caused by man. Greta is just a puppet of the adults around her and now become a corruption for Tax proposes!! So if that doesn't say it about $$$ nothing will… just ask Al Gore, since he left politics made more than $300 million from climate hoax, and according to him by now we have No ice over the North pole or Greenland and New York city is underwater… go figure

  4. Extremely bright young lady who isn't afraid to express common sense point of view in the ocean of stupidity and gullibility of people with no opinion on their own. Of course climate is changing. It's changing for 4.6 billion years. Non stop. And now actually climate is better than ever been . Not perfect but good.

  5. On the surface Mr Baker sounds like he knows what he is talking about. But anybody who does not follow the herd, will see his weak argument the minute he opens his mouth. Judge not and thou shalt not be judged. Keep talking to the screen, but my advice is, try and make a little more sense as you mature. Who knows, one day you may even begin to understand.

  6. Seibt is member of "JUNGE ALTERNATIVE", which was declared as "anti-constitutional" and "right-wing extremist group" (Wikipedia) by the German Defense of Constitution. She is sponsored by "Heartland Institute". Wikipedia: "The Institute conducts work on issues including education reform, government spending, taxation, healthcare, tobacco policy, global warming, hydraulic fracturing …(,…) In the 1990s, the Heartland Institute worked with the tobacco company Philip Morris to attempt to discredit the health risks (…) and to lobby against smoking bans. Since the 2000s, the Heartland Institute has been a leading promoter of climate change denial." Heatland Institute was mainlyfundet by tobacco, oil-, coal- and gas Companies and politically conservative foundations connected to these industries.

  7. Oh, no, somebody stop this young lady. We can't have young people talking common rational sense, it might confuse all the sheep who follow our alarmist and globalist agenda. Can't we somehow tie her to the fossil fuel industry? Maybe we can discredit her with some nasty false scandals? She has no idea just how psycho our alarmist crowd is. She is not going to get away with speaking the truth.

  8. The first thing I did after seeing Greta's first speech was look up her history. That told me all I needed to know. For those wondering where she came from, look up her family.

  9. Fortunately, science is not a marketing exercise which means truthful voices will rise above others and endure. I expect to be hearing from Naomi Seibt for a very long time. Oh, and young people have a habit of becoming older people. Much wiser people very quickly…

  10. Naomis pure function is to communicate with youth, old 60 year old climate scientists like Willie Soon don’t really connect well with youth. But I see a trend of people openly questioning the climate change argument , she will only add to the discussion and that I support, however at my age I try to listen to the old scientists and look at data that has been accumulated over time and since 1900 our temperature has been flat with the exception of the 1920-1950 which had a record number of days above 90 Fahrenheit, since then it’s been more or less flat.

  11. You're a climate alarmist. Naomi is the one doing research and using scientific research. Greta is just parroting what she's told. You must be ignoring the fact Greta can't answer a question off script.

  12. 1:38 May I indeed remind mr. Baker that Naomi has won a research price in Physics for younger people and graduated from highschool at the age of Greta Tunberg? Something that Greta will never live up to for obvious reasons. The two are not equal and should therefore be considered at their own merits. I've made my choice.

  13. With respect, i have to strongly disagree that Siebt doesn't represent a constituency. I think young adults (older gen Z) who are tired of having alarmism shoved in their face 24/7, being told they have no bright future to look forward to and that their personal achievements are relatively worthless are a quiet but significant portion of the population. I don't agree with Siebt, necessarily, but i think she is on track, potentially, to be the figurehead of that group. All that depends on the branding job she does of course.

  14. We are destroying the planet, animals are dying because of the loss of their ecosystem. Naomi is a scientific denier plain and simple who needs to travel and study the observation as opposed to getting funded by the Heartland Institute that only represents the fossil fuel industry.

  15. Naomi Seibt spoke and is being paid, by the Heartland Institute, a free-market conservative think-tank. Typically, those who have come to brand themselves as climate science 'skeptics,' demonstrate no interest in critically examining those who they have come to idolize, such as the speakers featured by the Heartland Institute.

    The Heartland Institute

    Heartland Institute Exposed: Internal Documents Unmask Heart of Climate Denial Machine

    Exposé Shows Rise of Heartland Institute’s Climate Denial Efforts Overseas, Using Dark Money and a YouTuber

    Hard Times in the Climate Denial Business for the Heartland Institute

    Heartland Insider Exposes Institute's Budget and Strategy

    Naomi Seibt

  16. Those, who proudly brand themselves as 'climate science skeptics' tend to not bother questioning the information sources that they have chosen to immerse themselves into.

    Climate change is real, so why the controversy and debate? Learn to make sense of the science and to respond to climate change denial in Denial101x, a MOOC from UQx and edX.

    DENIAL101x FLICC The Techniques of Science Denial Part 1

    DENIAL101x FLICC The Techniques of Science Denial Part 2

    DENIAL101x FLICC The Techniques of Science Denial Part 3

  17. She is not being paid by anyone.
    Maybe because of your views I could say ……Who is paying you !
    You love the sound of your own Voice too.
    Because it appears to me they way you talk. ???

  18. Does anybody else find it odd that because Naomi Seibt disagrees with the hysteria by today's kids about catastrophic climate change that her backing is immediately questioned? However, Greta Thunberg's backing is never questioned? Further, Greta always avoids discussing the science not because it is "a well judged response" as is made out in this video, but because Greta knows nothing about the science. Naomi on the other hand has educated herself on the science and will discuss openly. This unbalanced approach leaves one questioning the motivation behind it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

12 + fourteen =